At least three of the district court "judges' presently issuing the functional equivalent of 'national injunctions' against President Trump's executive actions are, simultaneously, the proud heads of families involved in dem fundraising off those very injunctions [family members, btw, who are profiteering off their fundraising by taking 10-15% off the top of the contributions coming in].
Our "brave" republican representatives should subpoena these "judicial officers" ---not to debate the merits of the cases they're taking on [that would violate the principle of Separation of Powers] ---but to explain why they haven't voluntarily recused themselves from cases in which they have a financial stake.
Even if no legislation results from these hearings [which. let's face it, is a 100% certainty], it will be fun for the nation to see up close what sleazes these "jurists" are.
At least three of the district court "judges' presently issuing the functional equivalent of 'national injunctions' against President Trump's executive actions are, simultaneously, the proud heads of families involved in dem fundraising off those very injunctions [family members, btw, who are profiteering off their fundraising by taking 10-15% off the top of the contributions coming in].
Our "brave" republican representatives should subpoena these "judicial officers" ---not to debate the merits of the cases they're taking on [that would violate the principle of Separation of Powers] ---but to explain why they haven't voluntarily recused themselves from cases in which they have a financial stake.
Even if no legislation results from these hearings [which. let's face it, is a 100% certainty], it will be fun for the nation to see up close what sleazes these "jurists" are.